Follow Us

Header Ad

Latest Posts

Categories

A stalemate for social networks in the Russian Federation: how the authorities are fighting censorship using censorship methods


On February 1, amendments to the legislation of the Russian Federation came into force, regulating the dissemination of information on social networks. They obliged the owners of such networks to control user content and actually engage in censorship.

For companies, this means huge costs for moderation tools, but even if they are ready for this, the risk of breaking extremely vague rules will still remain, experts say.

Partner of the law firm Digital Rights Center Mikhail Tretyak and lawyer Nikita Istomin spoke in more detail about the new Russian realities especially for ForkLog.


  • The Russian authorities are trying to legally oblige social networks to block unwanted content. From the owners of these companies, the implementation of the requirements will require colossal costs – it is unclear whether they are ready to accept them for the sake of the Russian market.
  • In parallel, the authorities are trying to prohibit social networks from blocking “socially significant information”, but the legislation does not contain such a concept. This opens up opportunities for regulators to interpret the norm broadly.
  • Complicated requirements make life difficult for domestic IT companies as well.

The next stage in the development of state regulation of the Internet in Russia has a two-way direction.

On the one hand, Roskomnadzor requires the removal of locks from accounts that publish political content on Instagram, as well as from Russian media accounts and their videos on YouTube.

On the other hand, from March 10, Roskomnadzor began to slow down Twitter for failure to comply with the requirements of the recently entered into force amendments to Federal Law No. 149-FZ of July 27, 2006 “On Information, Information Technologies and Information Protection.”

We are talking about the introduction by the Federal Law of December 30, 2020 No. 530-FZ “On Amendments to the Federal Law” On Information, Information Technologies and Information Protection “Article 10.6” Features of the dissemination of information in social networks “, which entered into force on February 1, 2021 of the year.

This article contains the definition of a social network, which Twitter, as you might guess, is fully consistent.

Abbreviated as this definition, it covers any online service that meets the following criteria:

  • have the functions of creating personal user pages and exchanging information;
  • available in the state language and in the languages ​​of the peoples of the Russian Federation;
  • advertising aimed at consumers on the territory of the Russian Federation can be distributed through the services;
  • more than 500 thousand users have access to each such service within 24 hours from the territory of the Russian Federation.

The owners of social networks are de jure and de facto obliged to exercise full control over the information disseminated by users. Article 10.6 establishes in general terms the obligation of the owner (and in fact, the operator) of the social network not to allow its use for the purpose of:

  • committing crimes;
  • disclosure of information protected by law;
  • dissemination of information with public calls for terrorism or justifying it, extremist materials, propaganda of pornography, the cult of violence and cruelty, as well as containing obscene language.

Information protected by law means state, commercial, professional and other secrets, as well as those types of information, the dissemination of which was restricted by other federal laws long before the introduction of this article.

A more detailed list is contained in the List of Confidential Information (approved by Presidential Decree No. 188 of March 6, 1997). This also includes information about persons under state protection.

However, from January 10, 2021, the Federal Law of December 30, 2020 No. 515-FZ, which came into force, will allow the state to restrict information about civil servants, their relatives, about their property, not only in the event of a threat to their life or health, but also simply in connection with their being in the civil service. This restriction naturally includes not only information about civil servants per se, but also online publications of journalistic investigations about cases of their corruption.

Moreover, general obligations are introduced to comply with the prohibitions and restrictions established by the legislation on referendum and elections.

Obviously, such a provision was included in the text of the article due to the facts established by the RKN of posting political ads on Google, YouTube and Facebook on the eve of the elections (violation of the day of silence) in the fall of 2019.

And the very general wording establishes the obligation “to observe the rights and legitimate interests of citizens and organizations, including the honor, dignity and business reputation of citizens, the business reputation of organizations” – a provision that will most likely be interpreted as broadly as possible.

In addition to the aforementioned general obligations to prevent the use of social networks for certain purposes, Article 10.6 obliges the owners of social networks to actually become a “censor”, independently monitor social networks and restrict access to a specific list of information. This information includes:

  • obvious illegal information (for example, pornographic materials with minors, methods of committing suicide and calls for suicide, methods and methods of drug production);
  • rather controversial information, which, nevertheless, more and more often become the subject of legal proceedings in the framework of criminal cases of extremism, mass riots (including calls for this kind of activity) or administrative cases (involvement in unauthorized rallies, insulting the authorities, the spread of “fake »News).

With the introduction of these restrictions and the entry into force of amendments adopted to the Federal Law of December 30, 2020 No. 482-FZ “On Amendments to the Federal Law” On Measures of Influence on Persons Involved in Violations of Fundamental Human Rights and Freedoms, Rights and Freedoms of Citizens Russian Federation ”, the owners of social networks are in a very difficult position.

This is due to the fact that now the owner can be recognized as involved in violations of fundamental human rights and freedoms, rights and freedoms of citizens of the Russian Federation in case of restriction of socially significant information on the territory of the Russian Federation (including messages and / or materials of registered media).

The main difficulty lies in the simultaneous fulfillment of two requirements at once: on the one hand, to restrict certain types of information, and on the other, not to restrict access to socially significant information.

The current legislation does not contain a definition of “socially significant information” (that is, any information can be attributed to it), and in some cases there is no specifics in the list of information to be restricted.

A kind of paradox is that deleting or banning the publication of content “just in case” in order to avoid claims of Roskomnadzor (RKN) may have the opposite effect and entail such claims.

Inconsistent enforcement does not inspire confidence either: there is a risk that, for example, materials from some media outlets that formally fall under the category of information to be restricted will be selectively removed or access to them will be restricted by the RKN, and materials from other media outlets on the same topics, but submitted in a different way, no.

In addition, the social networks themselves will have to not only more often interact with the state regulator, but also revise their processes of moderation and pre-moderation of content.

Ideally, content should be automatically pre-moderated through a software filter, after which any “controversial” content can be manually approved for publication by a moderator. However, the creation and improvement of such automatic pre-moderation systems, as well as the recruitment of additional staff of moderators, require colossal costs.

There is a practice when Internet services block the access of users from some states, including to reduce regulatory risks associated with the fulfillment of the requirements of the rules of law on the processing of personal data. In the case of social media, they can simply set up IP filters to exclude users from certain jurisdictions from their platforms.

Finally, some American Internet companies do not provide services to persons living in Crimea due to the sanctions. This means that in relation to such companies, measures should be taken to block their resources throughout the Russian Federation.

The amendments adopted in their current form represent a double-edged sword. They oblige the owners of social networks to engage in censorship, but at the same time they prohibit censorship in relation to undefined “socially significant information”.

It cannot be said that they help to maintain a balance between the protection of freedom of speech and public safety. These amendments definitely complicate further compliance with the requirements of Russian legislation, primarily by domestic representatives of the IT sector, whom the state has been trying to support for the second year without success.

Subscribe to ForkLog news on Telegram: ForkLog Feed – the entire news feed, ForkLog – the most important news, infographics and opinions.

Found a mistake in the text? Select it and press CTRL + ENTER

Fidenge Pecold

My profession is a journalist, but my hobby for 8 years has been studying Forex investing and trading. During this time, I managed to gain extensive experience in investing and trading cryptocurrencies and double my capital in the Forex market. To be the author of this magazine, the site owners invited me to participate in one of the 2020 trading webinars, and I will try to reveal the most relevant crypto market news for you.

    Leave Your Comment

    Your email address will not be published.*

    Forgot Password